top of page

Lost Innocence: From Daycare to the Human Condition

  • S. B.
  • May 1
  • 4 min read

An ordinary morning.In front of a daycare, the door opens and a small group of children walks out, guided by attentive adults. They move in a loose line, some holding hands, others distracted by the sky, a stone, a leaf. There are sudden bursts of laughter, wandering gazes, spontaneous gestures.

What strikes you immediately is not only their fragility or their beauty — it is their absolute neutrality toward the world.


They know nothing.


They know nothing of racism, nothing of sexism, nothing of domination, nothing of power structures. They know neither perversity, nor constructed jealousy, nor social hierarchies. None of them sees themselves as superior or inferior. None is managing an image. None is playing a role.


They simply are.


And in front of them, a nearly universal thought arises in the observing adult:How pure they are… how innocent they are.


A few steps further, imagine a similar scene: a litter of puppies or kittens discovering the world.


They stumble, chase one another, gently bite without malice. Their curiosity is total, their presence complete. They do not wonder whether they are likable, admired, judged. They do not construct an inner narrative about their worth.

And again, a spontaneous thought arises:How simple… how real.


The parallel is immediate: the same raw energy, the same spontaneity, the same absence of complex mental filters.


Then comes a rupture.


Because these children will grow.


And over time, they will learn. Not only to read and count — but to compare themselves, to define themselves, to judge themselves. They will absorb norms, expectations, and narratives about what they should be.


Little by little, an image of themselves will emerge. An image shaped by parents, school, culture, religion, social media, and the gaze of others.


The ego will be born, then structured.


And with it, a fracture:the one between what they are… and what they believe they should be.


This is where human suffering begins.


Disappointments, frustrations, humiliations, unfulfilled ambitions — all of these arise not only from events, but from this constant tension between reality and ideal.


An ideal often arbitrary, inherited, imposed.


And gradually, these same children, once free and whole, become strangers to themselves. They judge, constrain, compare, and defend themselves.

Some become hardened. Others anxious. Others lose themselves in illusions of control or recognition.


Without intending to, without even realizing it, they sometimes become their own tormentors.

And at times, those of others as well.


Let us return to animals.


A puppy or a kitten does not develop an identity dictated by ideology, social pressure, or complex symbolic systems. It does not struggle to be someone other than what it is.


It lives.


It feels.


It adapts.


Even in suffering, there is no additional layer of mental narrative that amplifies and prolongs pain.


And if we push the parallel further, another image appears.


That of farm animals.


Lives enclosed, constrained, organized for production. Fed, fattened, controlled. An existence without real horizon, without fundamental freedom. And an end that is programmed, often brutal.


There is something deeply unsettling in this.


Because modern humans, despite apparent freedom, often live within similar structures: rigid frameworks, imposed rhythms, external goals, constant expectations.


But with one major difference:humans resist internally.


They do not accept.


They struggle, they suffer from this condition, they wrestle with what they perceive as unjust, insufficient, inadequate.


By contrast, the wild animal — the one that lives outside of captivity — seems to fully inhabit its existence. It does not conceptualize impermanence, but it lives it. Its life is complete until it ends.


And when it ends, it simply ends.


Without added drama. Without narrative. Without inner noise.

So a question arises.


At what point did we leave that original state? And more importantly, was it inevitable?

Because those children leaving daycare are not yet divided.They are not yet at war with themselves.


They still carry within them a form of coherence that most adults have lost.

Perhaps growing up should not mean becoming fragmented.Perhaps the real human challenge is not to become someone…but not to entirely lose what we were before becoming.


Breaking out of this cycle requires both inner transformation and collective responsibility. Individually, it begins with becoming aware of the mechanisms that govern us: recognizing the weight of the ego, social expectations, and self-images that generate frustration and suffering. This involves a sincere observation of one’s thoughts, a step back, and a gradual reconciliation between what we are and what we believe we should be. Cultivating simplicity, presence, and a certain humility helps restore inner coherence.

Collectively, it calls for rethinking the frameworks in which we evolve: an education less centered on comparison and performance, and greater emphasis on empathy, respect for living beings, and cooperation over competition. It also means limiting influences that reinforce artificial pressures—whether cultural, economic, or digital—so that individuals can develop without losing themselves. It is in this balance between personal awareness and the evolution of our shared structures that a more peaceful and grounded way of living in the world can emerge.


Recent Posts

See All
To Love Is to Be Attentive

When the Ego Falls Silent, Love Finally Speaks We often believe that loving means feeling intense passion, an irresistible emotion, or an attraction that defies logic. Yet the depth of love isn’t foun

 
 
bottom of page